Proof of what each visitor actually chose

For as long as you need to be able to evidence it, which in practice means past the point where the consent itself has expired or been withdrawn. Retention is configurable, because the right answer depends on your own retention policy rather than on ours.

No, and that is deliberate. The record proves a choice was made against a specific version of the banner without building a profile of who made it. Solving proof by storing enough to identify somebody later creates a bigger problem than it solves.

Yes, from the dashboard, without asking us. That matters more than it sounds: if answering a data subject request means opening a support ticket with your vendor, the thirty day clock is running while you wait. Enterprise customers can also have records delivered to their own systems.

A new version is created and new records point at it. Existing records keep pointing at the wording that was actually on screen when they were written, which is the only thing that makes them evidence rather than an assertion.

The GDPR requires you to be able to demonstrate that consent was given, which in practice means keeping a record, though it does not prescribe a format. This is a general explanation rather than legal advice, and what your organisation needs depends on what else it processes.

Ten euro a month per domain, with no limit on pages and no billing per visitor. That covers the banner, the tag manager and the weekly scan together, because all three are on every plan. Agencies and organisations running many domains have a partner rate, and organisations outside the fair use range have an Enterprise plan.

In Amsterdam, on infrastructure owned and operated by Scaleway, a French company. That matters beyond the map pin: Scaleway is independently French rather than a European subsidiary of a US parent, so neither they nor we fall under the US CLOUD Act. Consent Studio itself is built and owned in the Netherlands by Vallonic.